Greetings
to all of you carbon based life forms that have somehow reached the absolute
dregs below the dregs of the interwebnet and ended up here! All I can say is that you’ve come upon me during
a most fortuitous moment in time! Yes,
that’s right! I just finished reading
Martin Short’s autobiography, I Must Say,
and I myself must say that it was very charming and well done! “What does that have to do with this post?”
you might ask. Allow me to reply with confidence, “Absolutely
nothing!” And now you’re angry and feel
a possible need to do me bodily harm.
Golly, I wouldn’t blame you whatsoever but hey…as long as I’ve brought
up bodily harm…
Recently,
toy manufacturer Mattel decided to do something that definitely shook the
world. So on a slow news day, where we
just didn’t want to hear one more bloody thing about Donald Trump, the universe
was informed that Mattel is now offering new body types of their long running
Barbie® doll. This even made the cover of the new Time
magazine, which no one really reads anymore.
The new body types are going to be: petite, tall, and curvy. Future body types will be offered depending
on sales. Doll body molds being
considered are: spinster, dumpy, frumpy, “98 Cigarettes and a Bottle of Wine a
Day”, and “Angry Taco Bell Night Manager”.
MAD apparently forgot the Fatal Attraction Barbie. |
The world obviously responded with a
hearty cheer! This truly is a remarkable
time to be a woman and how empowering this definitely is! Definitely!
Yay? Ahem. Before we all get caught up in the swell of
commentators who will most assuredly comment on this with their commenting
comments, allow me to waste your time with a few thoughts on this non-news
waste of your time.
When I was a child, I loved action
figures. Still do, much to the chagrin
of my wife, but that’s that. My kids are
now reaching an age where they want to play with action figures and toys of all
types. (This means I have an excuse to
get more action figures for me, uh I mean, the children to play with. Yes,
the children. Yep.
Not me. Nope. No way.)
But back when the dinosaurs still roamed the earth, when I was a child
seeking out a G.I. Joe or a M.A.S.K toy or a Batman action figure, did I seek
out a Batman that looked just like my 9 year-old self and represented my then
body type? Nope. Did I feel slighted because Kenner or Toy Biz
didn’t offer such a toy that represented Batman as a 9 year-old? Not at all.
Did I as a 9 year-old boy want to play with a 9 year-old boy Bruce Wayne
toy? Not a chance. I wanted the full-blown idealized Batman in
all his caped glory, with muscles and a utility belt and a Batmobile, beating
the living hell out of the Joker. This
is far from reality, this is a fantasy, which is where toys should reside.
Can this car be any cooler to play with? Why weren't real life versions ever sold? |
Do little kids really actually want
reality in their toys? Does market
research prove this? Is there a profit
to be made with having say, a pudgy Wolverine action figure or a Wonder Woman
that is petite? Why own a Superman toy
that resembles your dad’s 47 year-old second cousin after his 5th
beer? Why drag that much reality into
the toy world? After all, my boys think
that Thomas the Tank Engine can talk to them.
My daughter thinks that lightsabers are cool and dragons can fly. This is not reality. It is fantastical fun, plain and simple. Why are we overthinking this? Is this yet another area where oversensitive
adults are spoiling something for kids?
Perhaps this is another case where
boys and girls are wired differently. Yet,
in my heart of hearts at one point, I knew that Han Solo wasn’t a real person,
Transformers weren’t comingling with real cars in the streets of my hometown,
and the odds of Cobra getting a weather machine were astronomical, especially
as long as Snake Eyes was there to stop them.
But I still played with the toys despite having these thoughts
infiltrating my imagination. Did little
girls think that Strawberry Shortcake lived in a nearby garden patch, She-Ra
was just an ocean away, and Jem and the Holograms would someday deserve a
modern day retelling in film form because their story was so compelling?
Ye gods why is something so simple being overthought and ruined? Are there little boys on the chubby side that
refuse Batman toys, but just want Penguin figures because they identify with
him instead? Nope. And they probably hate umbrellas to boot. These parents need to stop being so thin
skinned. If your child didn’t turn out
right, the chances are that Spider-Man Lego set had nothing to do with it. If your daughter is at an emotional crossroads
and her fragile ego takes everything personally, this is known as puberty and
the Barbie playset had nothing to do with it.
Just take a step back. Enjoy the
fresh air and leave Superman and Barbie and the rest be their stylized fantastical
personalities.
"Hey Pengy! Kool-Aid Man sends his best!" |
At the end of the day, don’t take
away the fantasy from toys. Little girls
don’t need to be reminded of the realities of the human body because they see
their realistic Barbie. Little boys don’t
need to know that holding a sword aloft whilst screaming “By the power of
Grayskull!” produces nothing but an echo and that’s all. Let the kids be princesses and jedis and let
them play. Little kids don’t need their
imaginations stunted and their lives evaluated by the time they are 10. After all, isn’t that what high school is for? So let nature take its course and let Barbie
retire to her Malibu Dream House without having to worry if the taller version
of herself fits in the pink and purple Corvette.